Legal Opinion

Krukas v. Aarp

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 17, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-1124Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HELEN KRUKAS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 18-1124 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell AARP, Inc., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiff, Helen Krukas, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated (except for individuals residing in California), as well as the general public, brings this putative class action against the defendants, AARP Inc., (“AARP”), AARP Services Inc. (“ASI”), and AARP Insurance Plan (“AARP Trust”) (collectively referred to as “AARP”), alleging a violation of the Washington D.C.…

2Cases cited126 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API