Legal Opinion

Adair v. England

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 10, 2002No. Civil Action 00-0566 (RMU), 99-2945 (RMU)PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Denying In Part And Granting In Part The Dependants’ Motion To Dismiss; Denying As Moot The Defendants’ Motion To Hold The Proceedings In ABEYANCE; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE The Plaintiffs’ Motion For Partial Summary Judgment; Denying Without Prejudice The Plaintiffs’ Motion To Allow A Chaplain Plaintiff To Use A Pseudonym

URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

These cases incite a probing scrutiny of the First Amendment’s Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses. While the vast majority of First Amendment religion cases involve laws or governmental policies that allegedly…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  2. Larsen v. US NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  3. Adair v. EnglandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  4. Larsen v. United States NavyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  5. Adair v. EnglandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API