Legal Opinion

Adair v. England

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 27, 2002No. Civ.A. 00-0566(RMU), Civ.A. 99-2945(RMU)PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

URBINA, District Judge.

Denying Without Prejudice the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment;

Denying Without Prejudice the Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

I. INTRODUCTION

These cases come before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment. The plaintiffs, current and former Navy chaplains and an ecclesiastical endorsing agency for military chaplains, bring these suits alleging that the Navy’s policies and practices favor one religious denomination over another in violation of the First Amendment’s Establishment and Free Exercise…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Larson v. ValenteSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Casper Eugene Harding v. Vincent GrayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  2. In Re: Gordon R. England, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  3. Larsen v. United States NavyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  5. Adair v. EnglandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API