Legal Opinion

Larsen v. United States Navy

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 30, 2007No. Civil Action 02-2005 (RMU)PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GRANTING THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR Summary Judgment; Denying the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment

URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. The plaintiffs, Charles Larsen, Gregory McNear and James Linzey, are three non-liturgical Protestant ministers who applied for but were denied commissions in the Navy Chaplain Corps (the “Corps” or “Chaplaincy”). 1 They bring suit against the Navy and the Secretary of the Navy (collectively, the “defendants”) to challenge alleged prejudice in Corps…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Larsen v. US NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  2. Clayton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  3. Miller v. Insulation Contractors, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  4. Sierra Club v. Van AntwerpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. Freedom Watch, Inc. v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API