Wills v. Rhen Kong
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Colusa County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the head-note and opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
In this cause, the judge refused on-objections of plaintiff’s counsel to settle and allow the statement on motion for a new trial presented by defendant.
The objections of the counsel for plaintiff were that the defendant had not complied with the statute in procuring the judge to settle the same.
Prior to the refusal of the judge to settle the statement, amendments had been proposed to it by the plaintiff. After such refusal, defendant engrossed the statement with the proposed amendments, and presented the engrossed statement to the judge for settlement, and the judge, against the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Henry v. MerguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Connor v. S. Cal. Motor Rd. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Hicks v. MastenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Wheeler v. KarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Hoehnan v. New York Drygoods Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.