Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Batts

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 29, 1965No. 286PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaRKee, J.

Defendants first assign as error that Judge Bone erred in finding as a fact that on 6 June 1963 the State Highway Commission duly passed a resolution determining that it was necessary to appropriate an easement of right of way across the property of defendants herein for public use in the construction of Project 5.322, Nash County. Defendants’ second assignment of error is that Judge Bone erred in his finding of fact No. 5 “That the appropriation of Defendants’ property is for the purpose of constructing a State maintained public road.” Defendants’ third and last assignment of error, except a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Yarborough v. North Carolina Park CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Shingleton v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Brown v. GeraldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
  5. City of Charlotte v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Wilkie v. City of Boiling Spring LakesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  2. State Highway Commission v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Clark v. Asheville Contracting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Pelham Realty Corp. v. Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Vance County v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API