Legal Opinion
In Re Guardianship of Chandos
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 29, 1972No. 2 CA-CIV 1153PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
18 Ariz. App. 583 (1972)
504 P.2d 524
In the Matter of the GUARDIANSHIP OF the Person and Estate of Allan J. CHANDOS, An Incompetent.
Arthur L. RANES and Kathleen Rosa Ranes, husband and wife, Appellants,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ARIZONA, Successor Guardian of the Estate of Allan J. Chandos, an Incompetent, Appellee.
No. 2 CA-CIV 1153.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.
December 29, 1972.
Williams, Ryan & Herbolich, P.C., by Michael J. Herbolich, Douglas, for appellants.
Gentry, McNulty & Borowiec, by Robert A. Hewlett, Bisbee, for appellee.
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Arthur Ranes and his wife, Kathleen,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re McDonnell's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Bell v. BellArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- In re Cameron's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Bolander v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- In Re Mize's GuardianshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Perry v. JordanNevada Supreme Court · 1995
- Long v. TowneNevada Supreme Court · 1982
- Rhoads v. Harvey Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- SEC. Nat. Bank v. Peters, Writer & ChristensenColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.