Legal Opinion
Perez v. Tynan
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 26, 1969No. Civ. A. 12859PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A THREE-JUDGE COURT
CLARIE, District Judge.
This action was commenced pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, in behalf of the plaintiffs and others similarly situated. They request the convening of a three-judge court, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281, 2284, to test the constitutional validity of a vital part of the Connecticut Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Act, §§ 14-114, 14-117. The plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment and permanent injunctive relief declaring that the aforesaid state laws are unconstitutional. They also request that an injunctive order issue restraining…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Swift & Co. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California Water Service Co. v. City of ReddingSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- John E. Raper v. David J. LuceyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- Anacker v. SillasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Wright v. MalloyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1974
- Pollion v. LewisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970
- John Latham and Rachel Greene v. John J. Tynan, Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.