Legal Opinion

Nucor Steel v. South Carolina Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 14, 1992No. 23761PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

This utility rate case arises from a circuit court order which reviewed a semiannual rate adjustment decision of the South Carolina Public Service Commission (PSC). We reverse in part and affirm in part.

FACTS

When a nuclear power plant is operated efficiently, the associated fuel costs are significantly less than the costs for fossil fuel power generation. When a nuclear power plant is not producing at capacity, or suffers any downtime, the additional fuel costs are then computed based on the cost differential between the different fuel types. Because of the fluctuation of fuel…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Dunton v. South Carolina Board of ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Patton v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  5. Bradford v. Byrnes, GovernorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. South Carolina Retirement SystemSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Georgia-Carolina Bail Bonds, Inc. v. County of AikenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Medical Soc. of South Carolina v. MUSCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Buist v. HugginsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Wade v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API