Legal Opinion

Wade v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 11, 2002No. 25409PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Justice BURNETT:

Stacy Wade (‘Wade”) appeals the PCR court’s recommendation to revoke his inmate credits for falsely testifying under S.C.Code Ann. § 24-27-200 (Supp.2000). We reverse.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Wade originally pled guilty, as part of a plea bargain, to various charges including distribution of crack cocaine. Wade did not appeal, but ultimately filed for post-conviction relief (“PCR”).

Wade asserts he is entitled to relief because he was coerced into pleading guilty. Wade insists he pled guilty after his attorney instructed him to do so or he would lose the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. United States v. Christopher SimmondsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  4. Edwardo Reyes v. John P. Keane, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  5. Ex Parte Tom TongSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. DingleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  2. Council v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. In Re the Care & Treatment of ManigoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  4. State v. LeopardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Regions Bank v. StrawnCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API