Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. South Carolina Retirement System

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 22, 2001No. 25133PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOAL, Chief Justice:

Four retired state employees (“the Employees”) brought suit against the South Carolina Retirement System and the South Carolina Budget and Control Board (collectively “the Retirement System”) claiming their retirement benefits have been miscalculated. The trial court ruled in favor of the Retirement System and the Employees have appealed.

*343Factual/Procedtjral Background

In 1986, the General Assembly amended S.C.Code Ann. § 9-1-10(17) (Supp.1998) of the South Carolina Retirement System.1 This statute provides the definition of “average final compensation” for a retiring state…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kiriakides v. United Artists Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Paschal v. State Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Gentry v. YonceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Greenville Baseball, Inc. v. Bearden, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hutto v. South Carolina Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  2. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Catawba Indian Tribe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Smith v. TiffanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  5. Wade v. Berkeley CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API