Legal Opinion
Mintz v. Bohen
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided April 23, 1965PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
210 A.2d 569 (1965)
Ruth MINTZ, Plaintiff,
v.
Fred BOHEN et al., Defendants.
Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.
April 23, 1965.
Irving Morris, of Cohen, Morris & Rosenthal, Wilmington, and Milton Paulson, New York City, for plaintiff.
George T. Coulson, of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, for defendants.
SEITZ, Chancellor.
Plaintiff filed an action against Allis-Chalmers and its directors. It was derivative, at least, in part. It sought damages for past payments by the Company for premiums on individual insurance policies under a corporate retirement income plan. It also sought an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rosenthal v. Burry Biscuit Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1949
- Kaufman v. ShoenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
- Mintz v. BohenCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
3Cited by7 opinions
- Allied Artists Pictures Corp. v. BaronSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- Baron v. Allied Artists Pictures Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1978
- Dann v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
- Dann v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
- Lewis v. Scotten Dillon CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.