Legal Opinion

Dann v. Chrysler Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided December 8, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Chancellor:

This court approved the settlement of two stockholders’ derivative actions in the so-called Chrysler litigation. Dann v. Chrysler Corp. and Gallo v. Ackerman, — Del.Ch. —, 198 A.2d 185. The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed, Hoffman v. Dann, 205 A.2d 343, and certiorari was denied by the United States Supreme Court, Hoffman v. Chrysler Corp., 380 U.S. 973, 85 S.Ct. 1332, 14 L.Ed.2d 269. Thereafter the reserved issue as to the plaintiffs’ right to reimbursement for the fees and expenses of their counsel was tried and this is the decision thereon.

Plaintiffs in both actions…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. ShoenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
  2. Rosenthal v. Burry Biscuit Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1949
  3. Mencher v. SachsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  4. Mencher v. SachsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
  5. Hoffman v. DannSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bird v. Lida, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1996
  2. Day & Zimmerman Security v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  3. Levine v. BradleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  4. Levine v. BradleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API