Dann v. Chrysler Corporation
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
SEITZ, Chancellor.
This court approved the settlement of two stockholders’ derivative actions in the so-called Chrysler litigation. Dann v. Chrysler Corp. and Gallo v. Ackerman (Del.Ch.), 198 A.2d 185. The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed, Hoffman v. Dann, 205 A.2d 343, and certiorari was denied by the United States Supreme Court, Hoffman v. Chrysler Corp., 380 U.S. 973, 85 S.Ct. 1332, 14 L.Ed.2d 269. Thereafter the reserved issue as to the plaintiffs’ right to reimbursement for the fees and expenses of their counsel was tried and this is the decision thereon.
Plaintiffs in both actions have…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rosenthal v. Burry Biscuit Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1949
- Mencher v. SachsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
- Mencher v. SachsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
- Hoffman v. DannSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
- Dann v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chrysler Corporation v. DannSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
- Sugarland Industries, Inc. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- IN RE TESLA, INC. DIRECTOR COMPENSATION STOCKHOLDER LITIGATIONSupreme Court of Delaware · 2026
- In re Dell Technologies Inc. Class V Stockholders LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2024
- Thomas v. KempnerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1979