Kaufman v. Shoenberg
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Seitz, Chancellor:
Plaintiff seeks an attorney’s fee for services rendered in connection with the so-called Eleventh cause of action.
I ruled that since the corporation complied with the demand made in connection with the Eleventh cause of action within a reasonable time thereafter, the Eleventh cause should be dismissed. See Kaufman v. Shoenberg, Del.Ch., 91 A.2d 786. The question therefore is whether, as a matter of law, a stockholder is entitled to his reasonable investigation fees if his demand produces some real benefit to the corporation without the necessity for litigation. I conclude…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kaufman v. ShoenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chrysler Corporation v. DannSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
- Kaufman v. ShoenbergDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1954
- Mintz v. BohenCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
- Dann v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
- Mintz v. BohenCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965