Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Burry Biscuit Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided March 29, 1949PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Vice Chancellor:

The legal preliminaries to the present difficulty are set forth in Rosenthal v. Burry Biscuit Corporation, 30 Del.Ch. 299, 60 A.2d 106.

The problem now presented in both of the above captioned matters is essentially the same. Plaintiffs have moved for judgment on the pleadings in both cases. Defendants, as part of each answer, have set forth that the option which is under attack in these actions has been cancelled. Consequently, for present purposes, I feel that I am entitled to consider that the option has in fact been cancelled. I infer from this fact that the case is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. Burry Biscuit Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1948
  2. Holthusen v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Chrysler Corporation v. DannSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
  3. In re Sauer-Danfoss Inc. Shareholders LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2011
  4. Allied Artists Pictures Corp. v. BaronSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  5. Koppel v. WienCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API