People v. Guzman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPENCER, P. J.
Introduction
The trial court placed defendant Roberto S. Guzman on drug treatment probation pursuant to Proposition 36 in two separate cases. Defendant thereafter failed to comply with any of the trial court’s directives. He did not report to the drug treatment center or to his probation officer. He instead left the country, absconding from the jurisdiction of the trial court. Upon his return to the United States, defendant did not report voluntarily to his probation officer or the drug treatment center. He appeared in court involuntarily only after being arrested on a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re DeLongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. EsparzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. MurilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- In Re TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gardner v. SchwarzeneggerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. Dove IIICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. HarbisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. FRIEDECKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. HazleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.