Legal Opinion

People v. Guzman

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 30, 2003No. B160672PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPENCER, P. J.

Introduction

The trial court placed defendant Roberto S. Guzman on drug treatment probation pursuant to Proposition 36 in two separate cases. Defendant thereafter failed to comply with any of the trial court’s directives. He did not report to the drug treatment center or to his probation officer. He instead left the country, absconding from the jurisdiction of the trial court. Upon his return to the United States, defendant did not report voluntarily to his probation officer or the drug treatment center. He appeared in court involuntarily only after being arrested on a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re DeLongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. People v. EsparzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. People v. MurilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. In Re TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gardner v. SchwarzeneggerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. People v. Dove IIICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. People v. HarbisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. FRIEDECKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. People v. HazleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API