Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. FRIEDECK

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 2010No. B213944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, P. J.

Appellant John Casey Friedeck refused drug treatment as a condition of deferred entry of judgment (DEJ). (Pen. Code, § 1000 et seq.) We conclude his refusal makes him ineligible for probation under Proposition 36. (§ 1210 et seq.) We approve People v. Strong (2006) 138 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1 [41 Cal.Rptr.3d 867].

FACTS

In April 2008, Friedeck pled guilty to one count of felony possession of a controlled substance, Percocet. The trial court placed him on DEJ for 24 months provided he immediately obtained drug counseling and completed an AIDS education course.

On July 11, 2008,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. MazuretteCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. EsparzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. In Re TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. People v. GuzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. BradshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. People v. PorojCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. People v. WillisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. People v. ArchuletaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. People v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API