Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Murillo

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 22, 2002No. E030638PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, J.

Defendant, Patricia Ann Murillo, appeals from an order revoking probation and sentencing her to 16 months in state prison. She contends the trial court erred in its determination that she was ineligible for probation pursuant to Proposition 36. We agree. Accordingly, we reverse.

Procedural History and Facts

On August 16, 1999, defendant pled guilty to charges of felony possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a) [felony possession of a controlled substance]) in response to a felony complaint (FWV18439) filed by the People on August 2, 1999. On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hodges v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re DeLongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Walt Rankin & Associates, Inc. v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. TilehkoohCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Duke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  3. People v. EsparzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. In Re TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. In Re MehdizadehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API