Legal Opinion

People v. Hazle

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 2007No. C052041PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORRISON, J.

Proposition 36 ordinarily allows eligible drug users three chances at probation before a trial court may send a defendant to prison, although the relevant statutes do not guarantee this result. In this case defendant’s second and third probation revocation petitions were adjudicated at one time, a common practice we have endorsed. (People v. Budwiser (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 105 [44 Cal.Rptr.3d 296] (Budwiser).) However, in this case the facts supporting the third revocation petition took place before the second petition was filed. Nevertheless, when the trial court sustained…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. VickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hart v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In Re TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. People v. GuzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barry Hazle, Jr. v. Mitch CrofootCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. People v. EnriquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. People v. SizemoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Hall v. Superior Court CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. People v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API