People v. Hazle
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRISON, J.
Proposition 36 ordinarily allows eligible drug users three chances at probation before a trial court may send a defendant to prison, although the relevant statutes do not guarantee this result. In this case defendant’s second and third probation revocation petitions were adjudicated at one time, a common practice we have endorsed. (People v. Budwiser (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 105 [44 Cal.Rptr.3d 296] (Budwiser).) However, in this case the facts supporting the third revocation petition took place before the second petition was filed. Nevertheless, when the trial court sustained…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. VickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Hart v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. GuzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barry Hazle, Jr. v. Mitch CrofootCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- People v. EnriquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. SizemoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Hall v. Superior Court CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021