Lindstrom v. Employers Indemnity Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
In this action, upon a policy of collision insurance issued by appellant to respondent, after a trial to the court and a jury, a verdict and judgment for $550 in favor of respondent were entered.
Upon appeal, the principal question to be decided is the construction to be placed upon a provision contained in the policy sued upon, rendering the policy void in the event that the assured was other than the unconditional owner of the automobile covered by the policy.
The complaint alleged, in substance, and it was not disputed, that the policy in question was issued by appellant on August 12,1925,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Day v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Hart v. Niagara Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Stebbins v. Westchester Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Askey v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Dooly v. Hanover Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McCann v. ReederWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Collins v. Lumbermens InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1931