Legal Opinion

Dooly v. Hanover Fire Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1896No. 2319PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Yakima County.—Hon. Carroll B. Graves, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

This action was brought in the superior court of Yakima county by the plaintiff (appellant herein) to recover from the respondent upon an insurance policy. The policy was issued on the 12th day of June, 1895, in consideration of the payment by the plaintiff to the defendant of the premium of $33.80, the amount of the policy being $1,000 upon building, $200 upon furniture and fixtures, and $1,000 upon stock of wines, liquors and cigars. The lot upon which the property insured was situated was held by plaintiff under a contract of purchase with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Washington Mills Emery Manufacturing Co. v. Weymouth & Braintree Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  2. Clark v. President of the Manufacturers' InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  3. O'Brien v. Ohio InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Insurance Co. of North America v. BachlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Vankirk v. Citizens' Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. MichaelIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Miller v. Phoenix Assur. Co., Limited, of LondonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Humble v. German Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. Pioneer Savings & Loan Co. v. Providence Washington InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API