Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 31, 2002No. COA01-1567PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*401McCullough, Judge.

On 5 September 1996, plaintiffs residence, located at 201 Forest Hills Drive, Wilmington, North Carolina, was severely damaged by Hurricane Fran and its aftermath. Defendant provided insurance coverage pursuant to Homeowners’ Insurance Policy Number HP 537794 effective from 15 June 1996 until 15 June 1997. Thus on 5 September plaintiff was fully covered by the aforementioned policy. Once defendant’s adjuster and plaintiffs could not reach an agreement on the value of the loss, the policy’s appraisal clause was invoked. That provision provided:

If you and we fail to agree on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Woods v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Liggett Group, Inc. v. SunasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance v. DortchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Central Life Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gellman v. Cincinnati InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2009
  2. Nicolaou v. Vermont Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. APAC-Atlantic, Inc. v. Owners Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2024
  4. Accardi v. Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co.North Carolina Business Court · 2018
  5. Gilbert v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API