Legal Opinion

Nicolaou v. Vermont Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 19, 2007No. 2006-651PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.

The plaintiff, George Nicolaou, appeals an order of the Superior Court (Conboy, J.) granting a motion in limine of the defendant, Vermont Mutual Insurance Company (Vermont Mutual), which barred him from recovering the full replacement cost of his fire-damaged home and garage because he never undertook to repair or replace them. We affirm.

I

The record supports the following. While covered by a homeowners policy issued by Vermont Mutual, Nicolaou’s home suffered extensive fire damage. Under “Coverage A,” Nicolaou’s policy has a stated liability limit of $223,000 for the dwelling. The policy also…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. National Tea Co. v. Commerce & Industry InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Higgins v. Insurance Company of North AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Appeal of the Town of NottinghamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  4. Catholic Medical Center v. Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  5. Burton v. Republic InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nanika Wilkerson v. Am. Family Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. Horner v. Governor of New HampshireSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API