Legal Opinion
Gellman v. Cincinnati Insurance
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided March 18, 2009No. 3:04-cv-00234PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRAHAM MULLEN, District Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT pursuant to a stipulated procedure wherein the parties seek a declaration by the court of the proper measure of the covered loss owed by Cincinnati to Gellman under an insurance policy issued by Cincinnati.
FACTS
The parties generally agree on the operative facts and the court needs only to highlight them for the purposes of this order.
Gellman built and owned the Coer de Charlotte apartments (the “Building”) located at 1200 Queens Road, Charlotte, North Carolina. The Queens Road area is a very fashionable area and property…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Woods v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Rutherford v. Royal Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
- Cone Mills Corp. v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Gilbert v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Surratt v. Grain Dealers Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gellman v. Cincinnati InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Gellman v. Cincinnati InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009