Legal Opinion
Davis v. Vintage Enterprises, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided November 20, 1974No. 7423DC741 and 7423DC819PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
When the judge tries a case without a jury, he must find the facts specially and state separately his conclusions of law and thereby determine the issues raised by the pleadings and the evidence. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 52, Rules of Civil Procedure. When this is done, the appellate court can review the case to determine whether there is competent evidence in the record to support the facts found and whether the judge correctly applied to those facts the appropriate legal principles. Suffice it to say, the findings and conclusions made by the trial judge in this case do not properly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Performance Motors, Incorporated v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Parker v. Fenwick.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Hendrix v. B & L Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Driver v. SnowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Hajoca Corporation v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Frank's Maintenance & Engineering, Inc. v. C. A. Rorerts Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Vintage Homes, Inc. v. ColdironCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- T. J. Stevenson & Co. v. 81,193 Bags of FlourCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- T. J. Stevenson & Co., Inc., a Corporation, and Counterclaimant, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. 81,193 Bags of Flour, Etc., Adm Milling Co., Inc., Counterclaimant & Third Party Plaintiff- Cross-Appellee v. T. J. Stevenson & Co., Inc., Mv Nedon, Etc., as to Counterclaim, Republic of Bolivia, Ministry of Industry, Commerce and Tourism, Third Party Counterclaimant-Appellee, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Linscott v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.