Lilley v. Manning Motor Company
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtMooRE, J.
Plaintiff bottoms his suit upon the principle that where the property purchased is a mechanical device the buyer has a reasonable time in which to operate and test it and, if it is found that the machine does not fill the specifications of the contract and warranty, he may continue to keep and use it and may maintain an action for damages for breach of the warranty. Hajoca v. Brooks, 249 N.C. 10, 105 S.E. 2d 123; Hendrix v. Motors, Inc., 241 N.C. 644, 86 S.E. 2d 448; Potter v. Supply Co., 230 N.C. 1, 51 S.E. 2d 908; Huyett & Smith Mfg. Co. v. Gray, 124 N.C. 322, 32 S.E. 718. It is the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hampton Guano Co. v. Hill Live-Stock Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Perfecting Service Co. v. Product Development & Sales Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Don Allen Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Farquhar Co. v. Hardy Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Potter v. National Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moore v. Howard Pontiac-American, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
- Kuhlman, Inc. v. G. Heileman Brew. Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Stutts v. Green Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- General Motors Corp. v. Halco Instruments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Reece v. Yeager Ford Sales, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.