Halseth v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OTIS H. GODFREY, Jr., Justice.*
Defendant’s appeal in this declaratory judgment action challenges the determination of the district court that a provision in automobile liability insurance policies issued by defendant under which plaintiffs sought uninsured-motorist coverage is invalid because it contravenes the intent of Minn.St. 65B.49, subd. 4. We affirm.
The three policies in question all define a “hit-and-run vehicle” as “a land motor vehicle which causes bodily injury to an insured arising out of physical contact of such vehicle with the insured or with a vehicle which the insured is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brown v. Progressive Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Prosk v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. NovakWashington Supreme Court · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Surrey v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Lee v. SaligaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
- Cole v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Girgis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Theis v. Midwest Security InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.