State v. McGinnis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant, having been convicted before a justice of the peace of selling intoxicating liquors to an habitual drunkard, appealed, upon questions of law alone, to the district court for Eice county, where the judgment was affirmed by Buchham, J., and defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
The complaint upon which defendant was prosecuted before a justice of the peace charged that the defendant did “sell and dispose of intoxicating liquors” to a person named, who is alleged to have- then been an habitual drunkard. These questions *53are presented upon this appeal: (1) Does the complaint set forth more than one offence ? (2) Is the complaint insufficient because it is not alleged that the defendant was a person licensed to sell intoxicating liquors ? (3) Is the complaint defective in that it does not .allege the kind of intoxicating liquor sold or disposed of ? The prosecution is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. BielbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- State v. HydeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Gopher Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Wegan v. Village of LexingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. QuinlanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Klempp v. NorthropCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- State v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.