Legal Opinion

State v. Feldman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 1900No. Nos. 12,136—(14)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Goodhue county, Williston, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a conviction of the offense described in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

The defendants herein were convicted of the offense specified in the indictment, the charging part of which reads as follows:

“Said Henry Feldman and Harry Feldman, on the 20th day of August, A. D. 1899, at the town of Warsaw, in the county of Good-hue, in the state of Minnesota, did wrongfully and unlawfully sell and dispose of intoxicating liquor in a less quantity than five gallons, to wit, one quart of spirituous, fermented, intoxicating malt liquor, commonly called ‘beer,’ to one Jens A. Wallin, without first having obtained a license therefor agreeably to the laws of this state.”

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MimsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  2. State v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  2. Hannula v. Duluth & Iron Range RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. City of Duluth v. SidenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API