Legal Opinion
State v. Quinlan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 21, 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions
The defendants were tried and convicted in the- district court for Hennepin county, before Hicks, J., and a jury,upon the indictment recited in the opinion. They appeal from an order refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
Prosecution, resulting in a conviction, under section 112 of the Penal Code of Minnesota. The body of the indictment is as follows:
“The State of Minnesota against Michael Quinlan and Nathaniel W. King.
“Indictment.
“Michael Quinlan and Nathaniel W. King are accused by the grand jury of the county of Hennepin, in the state of Minnesota, by this indictment, of the crime of compounding a crime, committed as follows : The said Michael Quinlan and Nathaniel W. King did, on the 20th day of October, A. D. 1887, at the city of Minneapolis, in said Hennepin county, wilfully, unlawfully, and wrongfully…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. LawlorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- State v. HeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Briffitt v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Nevin v. LadueCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1846
- State v. BadenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dickerson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- State v. TremontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- State v. BrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- State v. GesellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Koetting v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.