Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Barnett v. Exchange Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 21, 1935No. 25166PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Logan county, -Okla., decreeing that the claim of the defendant in error, the Exchange National Bank of Tulsa, Okla., hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, was a preferred claim against the assets of the Farmers State Bank of Marshall, Okla., an insolvent banking corporation, in the hands of the plaintiffs in error, O. R. Thomas, liquidating agent, and W. J. Barnett, State Bank Commissioner, the successors in interest of the Farmers State Bank of Marshall, Okla., hereinafter referred to as the defendants.

The record discloses that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Multnomah County v. Oregon Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1894
  2. Shull v. BeasleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Shull v. Town of AvantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Ins. Corporation v. CasadyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  2. Cruzen v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  3. City of Barnsdall v. Barnsdall Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API