Legal Opinion

Shull v. Beasley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 17, 1931No. 20857PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

The defendant in error instituted an action in the district court of Oklahoma county against the plaintiffs in error to recover a judgment for $69.12 as a preferred claim against the assets of the defendant, Indianola State Bank, and recovered judgment therein for that amount. From that judgment an appeal was taken to this court.

The defendant in error will be hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, the plaintiffs in error, collectively, as defendants, and the Oklahoma City branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City as the Federal Reserve Bank.

The facts, as disclosed by the record, are…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. City of Douglas v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. State Ex Rel. Short v. NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Leach v. Battle Creek Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gay v. AkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. In re the Bank of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  3. Shull v. Town of AvantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Security Trust & Savings Bank v. ButtonArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Burdick v. SchmittNevada Supreme Court · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API