Legal Opinion

Cruzen v. Boise City

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1937No. 6453PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

Respondents’ predecessor in interest, John B. Cruzen, now deceased, originally plaintiff, owned bonds Nos. 38 to 44 inclusive of Local Paving District No. 26 of appellant city amounting to $3,422.68. The balance of the bonds of said district have been paid in full. The property owners in the district paid to the city clerk of said appellant sufficient money to pay all the bonds of said District in full. The city clerk never paid part of said amount to the city treasurer, but embezzled the same and respondents have never received the principal of their bonds, though interest was paid thereon…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Rothschild v. Village of Calumet ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Meyers v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Potter v. City of New WhatcomWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  4. City of Seattle v. StirratWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. City of Butte v. GoodwinMontana Supreme Court · 1913

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Munro v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Farber v. Idaho State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Melgard v. Moscow Idaho Seed Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Lynn v. City of LongviewWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Smith v. Boise City, IdahoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API