Bailey v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
COFER, Special Judge.
Attorneys for defendant in error have filed an able motion for rehearing, which shows care and diligence in the treatment and discussion of the proposition involved. However, the court believes that able counsel fail to grasp the material point upon which the decision in this ease rests.
The argument on rehearing treats at length the supposed fraud on the part of James H. Bailey. The court does not conceive that the issue of fraud is presented by the record. It is well settled that, where fraud is relied upon for relief from the obligations of a contract, it must be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Calhoun v. MaccabeesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Supreme Lodge Knights v. WellenvossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. City of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Stonewall L. Ins. Co. v. CookeMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
- Dewhurst v. Gulf Marine Institute of Technology, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
- Sovereign Camp W. O. W. v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Adams v. Lasalle Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.