LaBarbera v. Batsch
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, J.
Broadly stated, the issue in this case concerns the relationship between the saving statute, Section 2305.19, Revised Code, and the principle of res judicata. More precisely, the question is whether a case wherein final judgment has been rendered for the defendant on the ground that the action was not commenced within the period prescribed by statute, which judgment was appealed from and affirmed and further appeal rights have long since expired, can be rebrought under Section 2305.19, Revised Code.
Although defendant’s first defense does not specifically set forth that it is a defense of res…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- State ex rel. Sylvania Home Telephone Co. v. RichardsOhio Supreme Court · 1916
- Mason v. WatersOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Schneider v. BrewerOhio Supreme Court · 1951
- Bush v. ColeOhio Court of Appeals · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- National Amusements, Inc. v. City of SpringdaleOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,642 Miguel A. Gargallo v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. And Larry W. TyreeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Ronnie Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- James Loudermill v. Cleveland Board of Education, Richard Donnelly v. Parma Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Wyler v. TripiOhio Supreme Court · 1971
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.