Set Products, Inc. v. Bainbridge Township Board of Zoning Appeals
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
We are faced with two issues in this appeal: whether the doctrine of res judicata applies to the decisions of a township board of zoning appeals relating to variances, and if so, whether appellees demonstrated sufficient changed circumstances to avoid application of the doctrine in this case. We hold that res judicata is applicable to the grant or denial of a variance pursuant to R.C. 519.14(B), and operated to bar the April 1984 application by appellees, for the reasons which follow.
*263This court has held that res judicata, whether issue preclusion or claim preclusion, applies to those…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
- Schomaeker v. First National Bank of OttawaOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- LaBarbera v. BatschOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Superior's Brand Meats, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Trautwein v. SorgenfreiOhio Supreme Court · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Grava v. Parkman Twp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Schachter v. Ohio Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- State ex rel. B.O.C. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.