Legal Opinion

State v. Bartelson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 2005No. 20040266PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Brent Bartelson appeals from a criminal judgment entered on a conditional plea of guilty for possessing marijuana with the intent to deliver, reserving his right to review a denial of his motion to *826suppress the marijuana found in his car. Bartelson claims the marijuana was unconstitutionally seized as a result of an “extremely pretextual” stop. We conclude the district court properly refused to suppress the marijuana obtained from a search of Bartelson’s vehicle, and therefore, affirm the criminal judgment of the district court.

I

[¶ 2] Around 3:30 p.m., Bartelson was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Damato v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. GreggNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. KitchenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. OverbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. AdanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. JamesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. OstbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. BornsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API