State v. Bornsen

Jensen, Justice.

[¶ 1] Nathan Bornsen appeals from the judgment entered following his conditional plea of guilty to a charge alleging he had been driving under the influence with one prior offense. Bornsen asserts the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because his vehicle was unlawfully stopped by law enforcement. Because the district court did not err in denying Bornsen's motion to suppress, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

[¶ 2] On October 18, 2017, Bornsen was arrested and charged with Driving under the Influence-Second Offense. Bornsen filed a…