Legal Opinion

State v. Adan

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2016No. 20160083, 20160095PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Abdullahi Ahmed Adan and Sem-ereab Haile Tesfaye appealed' the judgments entered on conditional pleas of guilty to the charges of possession of a controlled substance with intent to manu*843facture or deliver. We affirm, concluding there was reasonable suspicion to extend the traffic stop and that the district court properly denied their motions to suppress evidence gathered as a result of the continued detention.

I

[¶ 2] While driving westbound on 1-94, Officer Steven Clark observed a maroon, four-door car traveling east at approximately 73 mph in a 75 mph zone.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. Miguel SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Donald H. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  5. State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. StandsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. LarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. VetterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. $127,930 United States CurrencyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. SargentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API