Legal Opinion
Jsc Transmashholding v. Miller
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 6, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1836PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge
JSC Transmashholding (“Transmash-holding”), the plaintiff in this civil matter, has alleged that the defendants, James F. Miller (“Miller”) and Chris Taylor (“Taylor”), are liable for conversion and unjust enrichment under District of Columbia law. See Complaint (the “Compl.”) ¶ 1. Currently before the Court is Miller’s motion to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and Rule 12(b)(7), for failure to join an indispensable…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Kaempe, Staffan v. Myers, GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Campbell v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Lannan Found. v. GingoldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Alemayehu v. AbereDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Cefarrati v. Jbg Properties, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- District Title v. WarrenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.