Legal Opinion

Ciprari v. Ciprari (In re Ciprari)

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided February 6, 2019No. B272039; B278187PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURREY, J.*

*89INTRODUCTION

Dorothy ("DeeDee") and Joseph ("Joe") Ciprari married on September 16, 1995.1 The trial court fixed the date of separation as August 13, 2010, the date DeeDee commenced this marital dissolution proceeding. The marriage terminated pursuant to a judgment entered March 18, 2016, which attached the court's final statement of decision.

On appeal from that judgment, DeeDee principally challenges the trial court's characterization of a majority of the cash and securities held in commingled accounts as Joe's separate property. As discussed more fully below, she attacks a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re Marriage of MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. See v. SeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Christy Carmen HammondUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2022
  2. Erickson v. RTED America, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2023
  3. Estate of Lu CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Estate of Witzling CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Gomez v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API