Legal Opinion

Lowell v. Maryland Casualty Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1966No. L. A. 29131PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

This action by an insured against his insurer for breach of its duty to defend a suit against the insured for assault and battery under a comprehensive personal liability policy involves the same problem which we have analyzed in our opinion in Gray v. Zurich Ins. Co., ante, p. 263 [54 Cal.Rptr. 105, 419 P.2d 168] L.A. 28897. We believe that here, as in Gray, the insurer bore the obligation to defend the third party suit.

Plaintiff entered into a “Comprehensive Liability Policy’’ with defendant to insure the buildings and automobiles which he owned in three major cities. The insurer, according…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Miesen v. BolichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. Signal Companies, Inc. v. Harbor Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Allstate Insurance v. NovakNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Delgado v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API