O'CONNOR v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
Two issues are presented here: First, was it error for the prosecution to comment, during the voir dire examination, on the fact that there were going to be defense witnesses ?
Second, did the trial court err in limiting the plaintiff in error’s cross-examination of Schoenemann, a prosecution witness ?
Reference to Defense Witnesses.
During the voir dire examination of the jury, the following colloquy took place between the defense attorneys, Frinzi and Toudor, the assistant district attorney, Tier-ney, and the court:
“Mr. Frinzi: Your Honor, to save some time here, I would like to take these…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hedger v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. CoccoOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
- Sprague v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- Edwards v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. SchenkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. GresensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Simpson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Tobar v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.