Tobar v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
Two issues are raised on this review:(1) Was the evidence presented at the trial sufficient to prove defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?(2) Was evidence seized in the search made twenty-two hours subsequent to the specific offense charged relevant to the issues and admissible in rebuttal?
Sufficiency of Evidence.
The test employed in assessing the sufficiency of the evidence was most recently stated in Lock v. State (1966), 31 Wis. (2d) 110, 114, 142 N. W. (2d) 183:
“We have said many times that when the question of the sufficiency of the evidence is presented on appeal in a criminal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Gauthier v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. StevensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Sparkman v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Crowe v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1968
- Jones (George Michael) v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. SpragginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Baldwin v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Banks v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.