Legal Opinion

State v. Gresens

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1968No. State 56PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

The defendant claims the trial court erred in not directing a verdict of not guilty. The motion was based upon the ground the state had failed to prove the unborn child was alive at the time the defendant acted. “Abortion” is defined in sec. 940.04 (1), Stats., as an intentional destruction of an unborn child by any person other than the mother. An unborn child is defined in sec. 940.04 (6) as a human being from the time of conception until it is born alive. Thus of the three elements of the crime which must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, namely, a living unborn child, a destruction and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BrodsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. StevensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State Ex Rel. Kowaleski v. KubiakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Welsher v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. O'CONNOR v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. LenarchickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. AnthonySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
  3. State v. SchenkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. ClarkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. NerisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API