Legal Opinion

State v. Schenk

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1972No. State 25PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

The facts of this case will be set forth in considering the issues raised on this appeal, which are:(1) Sufficiency of the evidence;(2) Failure to give a cautionary instruction, sua sponte, as to the testimony of defendant’s accomplice;(3) Refusal to allow cross-examination of defendant’s accomplice on the question of bias;(4) The display of an exhibit before it was properly in evidence and a statement by the prosecution in regard to taking a photograph thereof;(5) An improper courtroom use of measurements; and(6) New trial in the interest of justice.

Sufficiency of evidence.

The record reveals…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Whitty v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. BrodsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Affett v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Gelhaar v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Braham v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. BaldwinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. CydzikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Muller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. EarpCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API