Legal Opinion

Clemmer v. Enron Corp.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 30, 1995No. Civ. A. H-93-3550PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CRONE, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pending before the court is Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint (# 42).

I. Standards for Amendment

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that leave to amend pleadings “shall be freely given when justice so requires.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a). The policy of the federal rules is to permit liberal amendment to facilitate determination of claims on the merits and to prevent litigation from becoming a technical exercise in the fine points of pleading. Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182, 83 S.Ct. 227, 230, 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962); Conley…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD BRANDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. John W. Dussouy, Jr. v. Gulf Coast Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. National Association of Government Employees v. City Public Service Board of San Antonio, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reno v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1997
  2. Canterbury v. Federal-Mogul Ignition Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2006
  3. Khan v. RicheyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Williams v. Simmons Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2001
  5. Nuss v. Central Iowa Binding Corp.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API