Legal Opinion
Canterbury v. Federal-Mogul Ignition Co.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided March 3, 2006No. 4:05 CV 00560PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS
ROBERT W. PRATT, District Judge.
Before the Court are three motions filed by Defendant, Federal-Mogul Ignition Co. (“Federal-Mogul”): Motion to Dismiss (Clerk’s No. 6); Motion to Strike (Clerk’s No. 7); and Motion to Transfer Case out of Central Division to Davenport Division (Clerk’s No. 20). The matters are fully submitted and the Court will address each motion in turn.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Joseph Canterbury (“Canterbury”) filed the present action on September 12, 2005 in the Iowa District Court in and for Des Moines County, Iowa. Defendant removed the matter on October 11,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Phil Quick v. Donaldson Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Shirley A. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. LITTLE ROCK MUNICIPAL WATER WORKS, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kaufmann v. SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Harvot v. Solo Cup Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Krambeck v. Children and Families of Iowa, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2006
- Cole v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2006
- Cunningham v. Prairie Farms Dairy, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2021