Legal Opinion
Reno v. Metropolitan Transit Authority
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided August 12, 1997No. Civil Action H-96-141PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
GILMORE, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Summary Judgment (Instrument No. 39). Having reviewed the submissions of the parties and the applicable law, this Court has determined that Defendant’s Motion should be GRANTED.
I. Background
Plaintiff, Brenda “Penny” Reno (“Reno”), a fifty-seven year old white female, brings this action against her employer, Defendant Metropolitan Transit Authority (“Metro”), claiming that she was discriminated against in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”) and deprived of her First Amendment right of free…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kaplan v. City of Sugar LandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Allison v. City of Fort Worth, TexasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1999
- Henrise v. HorvathDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2001
- Robinson v. RubinDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
- Stanley v. University of Texas Medical BranchDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.